?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Journal of No. 118
The preferred nomenclature:
Recent Entries | Archive | Friends | Profile | Previous Entry | Next Entry

November 2nd, 2009

The preferred nomenclature @ 08:51 am

Tags: , ,

What the fuck are you talking about? The pedophilia in the Catholic Church is not the issue here, Dude. I'm talking about drawing a line in the sand, Dude. Across this line, you DO NOT... Also, Dude, pedophilia is not the preferred nomenclature. Ephebophilia, please.

Also, I am intrigued by the curious use of the word 'only' in the sentence "The statement ... defended [the Church's] record by claiming that "available research" showed that only 1.5%-5% of Catholic clergy were involved in child sex abuse." I guess even at the worst, a 95% is still an A, right?
 
Share  |  Flag |

Comments

 
( Opine)
[User Picture Icon]
From:ladyeuthanasia
Date:November 2nd, 2009 09:33 pm (UTC)

Evil Fucking Bastards

(Link)

They just HAD to find a way to blame it on "the gays," didn't they? Also, you're the only real pedophiles are grown men who molest little girls? What the hell?
[User Picture Icon]
From:aaronjv
Date:November 3rd, 2009 10:34 am (UTC)
(Link)
It's the Holy Roman Catholic Church. This is exactly the kind of response I expect from them.

5%? That's 1 in 20....hmmm, has someone made a game about this?

How many altar boys can you butt fuck before you're relocated to another (uglier, older, estrogen-filled) parish?

Maybe they can trade their Catholic fags and feminists for Anglican homophobes and misogynists.
[User Picture Icon]
From:notjenschiz
Date:November 3rd, 2009 07:39 pm (UTC)
(Link)
I would think even the low end (1.5%) would be higher than the incidence of pedophilia in the average population. Yes? No?
 

Journal of No. 118
The preferred nomenclature:
Recent Entries | Archive | Friends | Profile | Previous Entry | Next Entry