?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Journal of No. 118


May 4th, 2011

(no subject) @ 01:59 pm

Tags: ,

WTF.

"In her second arrest this year, the Atheists of Florida's legal coordinator was jailed Sunday on a charge of simulating a sex act in the presence of a 10-year-old boy."

i.e. she, inside her house--in a pretty lamebrained bid to get a kid to stop playing fucking basketball at 8:30 in the non-blessed AM right outside her house--made noises that "sounded like a woman experiencing sexual gratification in an extremely loud fashion," which were overheard by the boy and his father outside.

Clearly, she should have shouted "Oh God!" over and over again, and explained she was in the throws of religious ecstasy.

Anyway, the local law is the biggest twatwaffle in the story, but not by much.
 
Share  |  Flag |

Comments

 
[User Picture Icon]
From:ian_tiberius
Date:May 4th, 2011 09:13 pm (UTC)
(Link)
"throws"?
[User Picture Icon]
From:essentialsaltes
Date:May 4th, 2011 09:57 pm (UTC)

Stupid basketball

(Link)
I guess it's throes.
[User Picture Icon]
From:ian_tiberius
Date:May 5th, 2011 05:50 am (UTC)

Re: Stupid basketball

(Link)
I had faith in you, man. Seemingly everything I read nowadays has an "alot" or an "orientate", but you were my rock. And then...this.

I don't know what to believe any more.
[User Picture Icon]
From:essentialsaltes
Date:May 5th, 2011 01:49 pm (UTC)

Re: Stupid basketball

(Link)
This is what starts to happen when u buy a cell phone.
[User Picture Icon]
From:smaugslair
Date:May 5th, 2011 12:23 am (UTC)
(Link)
If she had been having actual sex, could she have been charged with something?
[User Picture Icon]
From:essentialsaltes
Date:May 5th, 2011 01:48 pm (UTC)
(Link)
She could in that town, it seems.
[User Picture Icon]
From:angry_vampire
Date:May 5th, 2011 09:53 pm (UTC)
(Link)
*facepalm* this is seriously what our courts our busy with
[User Picture Icon]
From:ladyeuthanasia
Date:May 5th, 2011 11:53 pm (UTC)
(Link)

I hate Florida THIS MUCH.
(no subject) - (Anonymous)
[User Picture Icon]
From:essentialsaltes
Date:May 6th, 2011 02:00 pm (UTC)
(Link)
I didn't want to get into the earlier charge, since IANAL, but the main evidence against her (as I understand it) is that she signed letters to local government officials with 'Esq.' after her name, although she does not currently practice law in the state (but is a retired lawyer from another state). She had not been trying to sell legal services to people, or representing herself as counsel in those letters, but only acting in her role as 'legal coordinator'.

Journal of No. 118