?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Journal of No. 118


March 7th, 2012

For once, maybe we're not irrelevant? @ 09:37 am

Tags: ,

So rough delegate totals for the Republicans are:

Romney 404
Santorum 165
Gingrich 104
Paul 66

A total of 1144 or so are needed to secure the nomination. A fair number of states, including big ones like Texas and New York, have proportional distribution of delegates. So it may still not be easy for Romney to get to the total he needs, even if he wins a lot of states. Usually, our June primary is so late, it hardly matters, but it could be interesting. California is a winner take all state, with 169 delegates. That's (slightly) more than all of the remaining delegates to be voted on after California.
I don't know how likely the scenario is -- 538 notes that Romney so far is skating right along the 'majority track' that would lead him to victory right at the end, a pattern which definitely ups the odds of California relevance if it continues. It would be interesting if we get to June and our 169 delegates would (barely) put Romney over the top. I find it hard to believe that Santorum has narrowed Romney's lead in California to 6%, but such is what a recent Field Poll shows.
California could be the battleground for all of the anti-Romney forces to come together to make their last stand to prevent him from getting the delegates he needs.
A similar scenario raises the really amusing spectre of Romney getting the delegates he needs in the absolutely very last state in the union to hold its primaries... winner-take-all Utah.
 
Share  |  Flag |

Comments

 
[User Picture Icon]
From:alex_victory
Date:March 7th, 2012 07:16 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Who is permitted to vote in the CA Republican primary? Only Republicans, Republicans and independents, or anyone?
[User Picture Icon]
From:essentialsaltes
Date:March 7th, 2012 07:29 pm (UTC)
(Link)
I believe that for the presidential primary, it is only registered Republicans.

"Each political party has the option of allowing people who register to vote without stating a political party preference ("no party preference" voters - formerly known as "decline-to-state" voters) to vote in their primary election. The last day for political parties to notify our office whether or not they would allow no party preference voters to vote in their partisan election was January 23, 2012."

The Republicans did not authorize no-party voters to vote in their presidential primary.
[User Picture Icon]
From:dogofthefuture
Date:March 14th, 2012 09:12 pm (UTC)
(Link)
As I recently discovered because I got a letter in the mail, as a registered no-party voter, I could (if I so desired) ask for a Democratic or American Independent ballot. I declined to do so on either count. If I'd had the option of a Republican ballot, I very well might have, just for fun.

I think it would be truly hilarious if Romney needed Utah to win but turned out to be so bad at connecting with people that even Mormons wouldn't vote for him.

Journal of No. 118